@knightauthor's place

Crit Cred


Is it just me or should those who perform critiques be required to follow a code of ethics? (btw I did say I was heads down all this week to work on my book but I just had to get this in). Let me explain: whether you are a beta reader, a critique group member, a critique partner or an agent at a conference, agreeing to perform a critique should require a few standards. Specifically, what types of things NOT to do. I’ve had my work critiqued a few times so I know what my responsibility is as a writer: don’t take things personally, learn from the comments, make needed adjustments and incorporate only what is really useful. But what about the one who is giving the critique? It goes beyond just being constructive and pointing out both the good and  the bad, it also requires and I emphasize, requires, some credibility standards. This is especially true if the person performing the critique is getting paid to do so, as in the case of agents at a conference (yes they get paid because the author has to pay for the critique as part of the conference).  If you have hired someone to critique your work, as in an editor, it is within your rights to demand a credible critique. Just because someone has the credentials to critique does not mean they are necessarily credible. Personally, if I am shelling out some dough for you to comment on my work, I want the most for my money. The following are two inexcusable practices I’ve seen done that really should not happen in a quality critique.

Premature questions – I know you have all seen this in your manuscripts: the person uses track changes and before reading the entire 10-20 pages (or whatever the number) they stop prematurely and add a comment about something they usually find the answer to later on in the read.  If you are performing a critique and you ask a premature question, have the courtesy to go back after you’ve found the answer and remove the comment.

Skimming – This should be a cardinal sin for anyone who performs a critique. We writers can tell when you have only skimmed the material. How? Because you end up asking questions again, this time because you skimmed the part that would have answered that question. This is especially insensitive and down right sinful if you are an agent getting paid to read for a conference. I’m not saying all agents do this, but many do, so I say to them, either agree to read fewer pages so that you can commit to doing a good job, or don’t do any critiques. It is not our fault that you did not have time to read the entire submission – most agents get these manuscripts well in advance of the conference. If you want us to be professional when we submit, be professional when you critique.

So now that I’ve gotten that off my chest, I must say that some critiques I’ve had were great; very well done. But for those of you who are skimmers and premature-question-askers, p-l-e-a-s-e cease and desist!


2 thoughts on “Crit Cred

  1. This is going to be a bit of a devil’s advocate comment. Let me say, that I’m not making these comments to argue your very valid irritations with lazy critique-writers, but to offer up an alternative view from someone who’s made the two mistakes you’ve pointed out.

    1) as someone who reviews and critiques books, I often will put in a note or question about something as it pops into my head, only to find the question answered shortly thereafter. The reason I don’t remove the comment? Because from my point of view, it’s helpful for the author to know how long it takes a run-of-the-mill reader to start raising the questions that I took note of. If the author has an answer within a page of my question, then great! I make a comment to the effect of “Aha! Now I get it!” and move on… obviously, the author is right on track with their imparting of information, but if that answer doesn’t show up for half the book… then I hope my comment points out the level of tension that arises in the space between question and answer, or that maybe the author needs to rethink when the question is answered. Maybe the author alluded to the question too early in the story.

    2)As for the skimming… yes, people skim, and they shouldn’t–and it’s awful–but sometimes the fact that they still have questions that you think were clearly answered doesn’t mean they skimmed. It could mean that the information wasn’t clear enough and the reader didn’t understand what they were being told. Before jumping to the conclusion of skimming, I’d take a long look at that portion of the story and make sure it’s as obvious and clear as intended.

    Of course, this is all just an alternate viewpoint, and not necessarily the only one. You could be right. Some critiquers are just bad. They may skim. They may be too lazy to remove a wayward comment–but they could have done it intentionally too with a completely different intention.

  2. Thanks for the comments and yes you are correct; your scenarios also happen so I appreciate the addition to this discussion / rant. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s